Dennis Ross, a neocon friendly advisor to Obama discusses his views on Iran

In this short video we hear Dennis Ross, a Neocon friendly adviser to Obama, discuss his views on Iran’s threat to Israel. It is curious that in this interview Mr Ross fails to disclose the fact that Israel currently has over 150 undeclared nuclear weapons. He does emphasize that Israel could potentially be taken out by just one Nuclear bomb.

Mr Ross is unabashedly unilateral in his discussion of the situation in the Middle East. It has been known for many years that Mr Ross is a rabid Zionist. In fact, one of the most vocal critics of Jimmy Carter’s book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid” was Dennis Ross.

Brief Biographical sketch of Dennis Ross:

Ross was born on November 26, 1948, in San Francisco. He lives in a suburb of D.C. with his wife and three children. According to his book, he was raised in Marin County, California, by his Jewish mother and Catholic stepfather, who maintained a non-religious household atmosphere. Ross did his undergraduate studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, and did graduate work in political science at the same institution, focusing on study of the Soviet Union. Ross continues to teach at various prestigious colleges. Ross is well sought after for his public speeches.

Criticisms:

During his years of trying to broker Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations he was criticized by people on both sides of the conflict. Palestinians made repeated references to the fact that he is Jewish, and some right-wing conservative Israelis branded him “self-hating” — each questioning his ability to be unbiased. According to Aaron David Miller, a member of the Ross-led US negotiating team in 1999-2000, under Ross they frequently acted as “Israel’s lawyer.”

According to Miller:

“With the best of motives and intentions, we listened to and followed Israel’s lead without critically examining what that would mean for our own interests, for those on the Arab side and for the overall success of the negotiations. The “no surprises” policy, under which we had to run everything by Israel first, stripped our policy of the independence and flexibility required for serious peacemaking. If we couldn’t put proposals on the table without checking with the Israelis first, and refused to push back when they said no, how effective could our mediation be? Far too often, particularly when it came to Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy, our departure point was not what was needed to reach an agreement acceptable to both sides but what would pass with only one — Israel.

Currently, Ross is counselor and Ziegler distinguished fellow of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. He is the first chairman of a new Jerusalem based think tank, the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, funded and founded by the Jewish Agency. Ross’s involvement in the Institute led some to assume that he would not resume his role as Middle East peace envoy, M. J. Rosenberg of Talking Points Memo commented, “I had thought that former Middle East peace envoy Dennis Ross hoped to return to mediation when the next administration comes in. Apparently, he’s had it. He is currently in Israel chairing a major Jewish leadership conference on the future of Israel and the Jewish people — with Netanyahu, Zuckerman, top AIPAC leaders and many of the other ‘usual suspects.’ This is not the kind of thing one does if one intends to get back into the ‘honest broker’ business. This is like George Mitchell (a Lebanese-American) chairing a session in Beirut on the Arab future. If he did that, Mitchell could still work on Ireland but not the Middle East.”

In the fall of 2005, taught a class in Mid-East Peace at Brandeis University, and taught it again at Georgetown University in the fall of 2006. In Spring 2007 he taught Strategic Negotiation and Statecraft at Georgetown and is teaching a similar course in Fall 2007. In Spring 2008, he is teaching a course in statecraft at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.

Ross is a Foreign Affairs Analyst for the Fox News Channel in addition to being a frequent commentator in The Washington Post and The New York Times. Ross’s first column at The New Republic, “Statecraft”, was published on April 9, 2007.

Ross was a noted supporter of the Iraq war, although he opposed some of the Bush Administration’s policies for post-war reconstruction.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Ross along with James Steinberg and Daniel Kurtzer are among the principle authors of Barack Obama’s address on the Middle East to AIPAC in June 2008, which was viewed as the Democratic nominee’s most expansive on international affairs

“Missing Links”, a new video on the 911 conondrum

I know that thousands  of peoples will watch this video, but  before seeing it is important that the viewer realizes that this video does not make a serious attempt to draw a distinction between the Neocons and their possible connection with 911, and  the population of Jews, and could potentially incite unfounded hatred against a larger population, who like the rest of American’s were victims.

At times this video shows footage that is not accurate, and it does so in order to convey a story that is known to be true, but for which no footage exists, a case in point is the footage of the dancing Israelis of 911; some of the footage of dancing men is not accurate.

Also, it is important to realize that this video goes through a list of people it claims are people with dual citizenship USA-Israeli, operating in the USA.  While a few of those people are known to have dual citizenship, it is not at all clear that the rest of them have dual citizenship.

Some topics discussed in this video are:

The Lavon Affair,

The Attack of the USS Liberty, and its cover-up by the USA government,

The Odigo Prior warnings of 911,

The Fox News coverage of the Israeli spies moving about prior to 911, and the fact that they were living very near some of the terrorists accused of 911. This Fox News expose was subsequently forced off the air, some claim, as a result of nefarious machinations by a Zionist watchdog trying to sensor how ordinary Americans perceive Israel.

Zim Shipping, the shipping company half owned by the Israeli government, and which broke its lease in the WTC nearly 2 weeks prior to the attacks of 911.

Dov Zarkheim, and his dual citizenship as well as the vast amount of dollars (trillions) missing under his appointment at the Pentagon. This video mentions Dov Zarheim’s employment in a firm involved in remote piloting technologies often mentioned in connection to the 911 events.

The attempted bombing of the Mexican congress by Mossad agents at around the same time as the tragic 911 events.

Curiously this video make no mention whatsoever of the EXTREMELY unlikely trades in investments vehicles that took place shortly prior to 911 and of the handsome profits reaped and as of yet unclaimed. This clearly prove that there was prior knowledge of the tragic events that would befall Americans.

It is imperative that the makers of this video tone down comments that can be used to implicate a larger population in the tragic events of 911. We are tired of hearing the USA media implicate *all* Muslims in these tragic events, but this does not justify the opposite approach, even if most feel more compelling evidence exists. The idea is to implicate those involved, and not a whole population. The Nazis were “The Nazis” not “The Christians”, although all the Nazis may have been Christians.

Following is the introduction provided by the video’s directors:

“Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the so-called 9/11 “Truth” movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminals group who masterminded the attacks. As they say, ‘if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.’ Utilizing evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies
and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to.”

The video may be seen at the following link: HERE HERE HERE

Goofy McCain being marketed

sick clown!

McCain jokes about our dying soldiers

This video includes both footage and text. McCain joking about IED’s and Rep. John Murtha’s response. McCain also making jokes about bombing Iran, cigarets killing Iranians, Muslim woman’s garments, suicide bombers, selling camels, woman being raped by gorillas, Chelsea Clinton’s and Janet Reno’s physical appearance, Fidel Castro dying, McCain Beating his wife, waterboarding, the people of France.

Fox lies again about Bush on Al Qaeda

On Fox & Friends, Brian Kilmeade falsely claimed that “the president of the United States never even said there’s a link between Al Qaeda and Iraq,” and that “[t]hat wasn’t the premise for going in there.” In fact, President Bush repeatedly said there was such a link, and that the United States should invade because Saddam might give his purported weapons of mass destruction to Al Qaeda.

You want to hear Bush claim that there was a connection? Simply click Here.

Views by Israel’s future prime ministers on Iran.

After Olmert decision to step down, candidates for Israeli PM leave ‘all options on the table’ on Iran. In this short video we are provided with a list of candidates likely to become future prime minister of Israel, and their views on the threat posed by Iran.

Is there evidence Iran is seeking nuclear weapons?

This short clip lays to rest most of the issues surround whether or not Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons.

Petro dollars and the Neocon’s attack on Iraq

Those interested in a glimpse at the petro-dollar cycle and how it might have been influential in contributing to the lies-based Neocon attack on Iraq (planned before 911), would find the following video worthwhile.

The claim that European economies would have been affected by Iraq selling its oil in euros is so, but only in a positive way. That the USA economy would have been affected negatively is correct.

Let me add that printing money to finance the lies-based attack on Iraq has been terribly inflationary and has driven the value of the dollar down relative to other currencies, something that the video does not mention.

Iraq financing its reconstruction due to its oil wealth?

Iraq has benefited handsomely from this year’s surge in oil prices and is well-positioned financially to shoulder a greater share of its own economic and security needs, the U.S. government’s accounting watchdog concluded in a report released Tuesday.

Yes, the lies-based Neocon attack on Iraq financed by printing USA dollars and selling debt to foreigners drove the value of the US dollar way down relative to other currencies around the globe, and the value of oil way up. So high now that the price of oil nearly doubled since the start of the attack. These higher prices have given Iraq a handsome profit due to its production of petroleum products, but eroded the purchasing power of the US dollar at home. Do you see the absurdity of the logic claiming that Iraq is able to finance its own reconstruction? This is really Neocon-friendly propaganda. This lie is akin to, say, you giving a very large sum of money to someone and then bragging about the fact that he was able to purchase your over priced house.

No Iran attack bodes well for the dollar.

“The dollar maintained its firmer tone Wednesday, buoyed against major rivals by more evidence of deteriorating economic fundamentals in Europe and Japan, in the wake of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s decision to hold policy steady for now.”

The real reason for this is that at this point it looks like the lies-based Neocon attack on Iran will not take place. This is good for the USA currency. Curiously, the article does not mention that. You should expect the price of gold to fall also.

In the event of an attack on Iran, you would see the opposite trend. Printing money to finance lies based proxy wars of aggression for con-artist that have taken over your government is not good for the national currency, especially if those you are being tricked into attacking are rich in oil and can disrupt the flow of oil to the rest of the world. The connection is a clear as 1+1=2, but the article conveniently forgets to mention it.